From: Siegfried Knoepfler
Date: 16. October 2010 09:52:25 +02:00
Subject: Re: an interesting quote
Three days ago I thought I'm winning back a little more control of my time. In this belief I began writing this post Thursday morning, after reading the digest that came in the night before. But then I had to go to work ... and control was taken away again!
And then all my little spare time was consumed by reading a flood of digests hotly discussing the question of lockbars and diatonic (im-) possibilities, nonetheless also interesting for me, the chromatic player. And I expected an even more interesting idea, perhaps revolutionising the whole autoharp concept, when Ron chimed in with the topic "Chordbars or no", but his exposition did then not really live up to the topic. :)
Anyway, it's now Saturday morning, and I try to get to the point of my old mail eventually:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
While I not always see fit to (fully) agree with Todd's expressions of strong opinion, today's epistle belongs to those I really like. I like especially his criticising the notion of bringing people "to tears at the revelation of the fragility of perfect beauty".
Indeed, I mostly try to NOT bring my listeners to tears, just because of the easily possible revelation of the fragility of my rather limited playing abilities! :)
Seriously, I won't deny the notion of being deeply moved at the view of perfect beauty. I find instances of perfect beauty certainly with examples of "poetry in motion" (Johnny Tillotson, 1960) but particularly with formal constructs like a strikingly elegant proof in a mathematical textbook or a piece of computer code which makes obvious that it can't be done better. (In the latter cases, my deep emotion looks rather like pure envy, however!)
So, in my musical endeavours, I value my arrangements, based on my exploration of music theory, over the recordings that I then make to see whether an arrangement sounds really as anticipated (and to help those who don't judge an arrangement just on the notation -- after I began to publish, on my Web site, arrangements I originally made for my own amusement, I also felt the need to demonstrate that and how they actually work).
Whereas I certainly always strive for playing as beautifully as I ever can and whereas I'm often quite unhappy with what I hear listening to the recording, I actually don't care so much provided that the recording shows that an arrangement does indeed work as planned: I seek beauty first in the arrangement, it's performance has much lesser priority.
This attitude of mine is of course in grotesquely stark opposition to the one which seeks perfect beauty in the performance, an attitude I presume for all true autoharpists (= autoharp artists!).
For me, autoharp playing is not so much an end as rather a means to further my insight into music. And so I play mainly for my own amusement. At the same time I appreciate very much the existence of the Cyberpluckers list, where I learned so much over the years and got ideas that never would have occurred to me.
I'm really grateful to all the autoharpists who provided insight into music theory as well as playing techniques and the mechanics and physics of the autoharp and who set standards that even I use as beacon on my way to improvement (and, maybe, to perfection?). [If you look into the intersection set of autoharpists that contributed most in ALL these aspects, you certainly find Bob Lewis; he deserves most of my gratitude, although I'm pretty sure that he heartily disapproves of my approach!]
Naturally, as I confessed before, I also love this list because of the people who bear patiently my ramblings and allow me to cater to my vanity. :)
Ziggy in Cologne, Germany
"The autoharp is the only instrument where the player can achieve instant mediocrity." (reported by Joe Riggs)
(I view this quote as a promise: so far I most often needed thousands of instants for decently mediocre results!)
Am 14.10.2010 KW41 um 03:34 schrieb firstname.lastname@example.org:
< ... >
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:34:01 -0400
From: Todd Crowley
Subject: [CP] an interesting quote
Cathy Brittell wrote: <<"Can a ukulele make a sound that will bring great
men to tears at the revelation of the fragility of perfect beauty?"
...Interesting and surprising that this quote should inspire such
The only discomfiture is the way in which such a statement reduces great
ukulele (or autoharp or any other instrument) playing to the level of
"To bring great men to tears at the revelation of the fragility of
perfect beauty" is hackneyed language that fails to capture the ineffable
nature of great music, art, literature, etc.
What does the "revelation of the fragility of perfect beauty" mean
exactly? "Perfect beauty" is in itself a cliche.
I'd rather leave such things a mystery left to the heart of the
beholder and not have it put into words.
I've heard all the great autoharp players in competition and
performance and I've yet to be brought to tears. Maybe that's because I'm
an ordinary man, not a great one.
I've been amazed, awed, left shaking my head in respect and envy, but
reduced to tears? not yet.
In the meantime, the statement about ukes, and in proxy, autoharps,
belies the populist appeal of these instruments, as expressed by Pete
Seeger, who said "[we should] not judge the musicality of a nation by the
number of its virtuosos but by the number of people in the general
population who are playing for themselves."
If autoharp teachers/A-list performers keep telling "the general
population" that they should aspire to "bring great men to tears...", it
promotes a virtuoso mentality, rather than Seeger's populist appeal to the
"number of people...playing for themselves."
When there as many players pursuing the autoharp or ukulele at the
highest level, as there are classical violinists or flutists, then maybe we
will get a player with the ability to reduce us all to tears, like Isaac
Stern or James Galway.
Until then talking about the autoharp or ukulele in such terms seems
pretentious. It's okay for ordinary people to enjoy making their own music
without worrying about the "fragility of perfect beauty." Just as it it
important for extraordinary people to strive to make the most beautiful
music ever heard on their instrument with an entire audience passing the
Cyberpluckers mailing list
End of Cyberpluckers Digest, Vol 77, Issue 19