Siegfried Knoepfler
Von: Siegfried
Knoepfler
Gesendet: Sonntag,
19. August 2001 02:11
An: 'Cyberpluckers'
Betreff: Chords
& modulation (long posting, music theory, definitely RAR)
With this posting I would like to discuss some music questions of a - at
first sight - rather theoretical nature but with - for me at least - practical
consequences.
What finally urged me to sit down for a lengthy (Warning!) elaboration,
were a passage from a recent posting by Terry, quoted below, a contribution by
Bud Taylor some time ago, also enclosed, and a - as far as I see - still open
question regarding the chord numbering method, put forward by John Dallas some
weeks ago, enclosed as well.
Following these references and their examination, I will illustrate my
points using the chords I employ for melody playing the gospel song "In
the Garden".
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Johnson
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 9:15 AM
To: Siegfried Knoepfler
Cc: 'Cyberpluckers'
Subject: Re: ... June Carters "Press On" A New
Perspective
[S.Kn.] < ...>
"Softly and Tenderly"
is a well beloved song in the South especially at
a Billy Graham or any revival
meeting. "In the Garden" is tailor made
for autoharp as a tender
"spiritual love song", and "I'll Fly Away" is
of course in everyone's
repertoire as a downright fast picking, feel
good song.
[S.Kn.]
<
... >
[S.Kn.]
Von: Lyman
Taylor
Gesendet: Dienstag,
24. Juli 2001 16:43
An: ...
Cc: Cyberpluckers
Betreff: Re:
C vs D
[S.Kn.] < ... >
While most
melodies of simple tunes are
diatonic, many of the harmonies are chromatic. In other words, the
chords which are used with those melody notes use notes
which are
not found in the seven note scale.
[S.Kn.]
<
... >
[S.Kn.]
Von: John
Dallas
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
7. Juni 2001 16:21
An: Cyberpluckers
Betreff: Re:
numbers instead of chords?
Eileen Roys wrote:
>This is so the piece of music can be played in any
key, and is sometimes
referred to as "The Nashville Notation
System"...<
As a somewhat advanced beginner, I am already familiar
(through this list,
of course!) with the "Roman numeral"
notation. However, a posting by
Clay
Bonser got me thinking, when he mantioned a tune
"going into another key"
than the one it started in. There are a lot of tunes that modulate like
this, and I have one particular one in mind - Siegfried
Knšpfler knows it
too - it's the German song "Aennchen von
Tharau". The first line of
the
song is in C major (as I sing it), but the second line
is in G major. It
then reverts to C major for one line, then modulates to
and stays in G
major until the last line, which is again in C. On the autoharp, I notice
that I'm constantly shifting my hand from the "home
position" for C major
to the "home position" for G major and
back. When I play it on the Anglo
concertina, I'm shifting my fingers back and forth from
the C row to the G
row. It's
not just a matter of a single chord here and there, which I
could reach from the main home position for C. The lines
genuinely have
different tonalities, though of course they are related,
being adjacent in
the Circle of Fifths. The actual melody, by the way, has no accidentals in
it, using only the notes of the C major scale!
Question:
How do you handle this in the Nashville Notation System?
The chords I use are
Line 1: C,
F, G7
Line 2: G, D7
Line 3: C, F, G7
Line 4: G, D7
Line 5: G, D7, G7
Line 6: C, F, G7
Line 1 would be "I, IV, V7", obviously. But would Line 2 be "V, II7"
or
"I, V7" but on a shifted fundamental? Or is the D7 in this case a "V7 of
V"?
I don't expect to be able to play the tune any better
for knowing the
answer to this, but it would be interesting... <s>
Cheers,
John
[S.Kn.]
Indeed, I find this question
very interesting, too! For the song "Aennchen von Tharau" you may
want to look up the URL http://ingeb.org/Lieder/Annchenv.html where
you'll find the German words (quite a lot of them, in fact!) and two MIDI files
playing the tune.
I've
collated the three of the above references, because
1.)
knowing Terry as a hot diatonic aficionado, I wonder how he can play "In
the Garden"; he would need at least a 3-key diatonic autoharp (as I will
try to show below);
2.) I
suspect that many of Bud's cases of non-diatonic chords for diatonic melodies
belong to the class of John's example, where we have a *modulation* to the
neighbouring key (in the circle-of-fifth), other such examples being:
BYCICLE
BUILT FOR TWO (key of G):
[G]Daisy,
Daisy,
[C]Give
me your answer [G]do,
[D7]I'm
half [G]crazy,
[A7]All
for the love of [D]you,
...
Here we
have with the syllable 'All' modulation into the key of D, starting with its
*dominant* chord A7. In the next line, omitted here, the tune returns to its
"home" key of G.
SILVER
THREADS AMONG THE GOLD (key of G):
[G]Darling,
I am [D7]growing [G]old,
[D7]Silver
threads among the [G]gold
Shine
upon my [D7]brow to- [G]day,
[D7]Life
is fading fast a- [G]way,
[D7]But,
my darling you will [G]be, will be
[A7]always
young and fair to [D]me.
[G]Yes,
my darling ...
Same case
as before: start of modulation with line 6, end with line 7. A similar example
would be HOME ON THE RANGE (cf. ... Where the [G]deer and the [A7]antelope
[D]play. Where [G]seldom is heard ...) as well as the Christmas songs O
SANCTISSIMA (O THOU JOYFUL DAY), ADESTE FIDELES (O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL) and
HARK! THE HERALD ANGELS SING.
One could
certainly find a lot more such tunes, "intermittently" (i.e. for a
short time, perhaps repeatedly as in "Aennchen", see John's posting,
or ADESTE FIDELES) modulating, which share a certain property: Looking at the
notes, you will *not* find any accidentals!
So the
tune itself does not at all hint at the modulation, it appears "strictly
diatonic", whereas needed chords cannot be built up from the notes of the
scale, e.g. for chord A7 (or A) you need note c#, not belonging to the scale of
G.
There are
a lot more of those intermittently modulating tunes, but actually *with*
accidentals. To these I count I'VE BEEN WORKIN' ON THE RAILROAD, FLOW GENTLY
SWEET AFTON and JEANIE WITH THE LIGHT BROWN HAIR as well as the Christmas song
DECK THE HALLS WITH BOUGHS OF HOLLY, to name but a few.
Now, I
think that there is no class difference between these two groups of
intermittently modulating songs. The first group avoids accidentals by sheer
luck, i.e. the melody just happens to use only notes which belong to both keys,
the "home" key as well as the one into which the modulation shifts.
So what
is the point?
Instead
of speaking of a tune being in, say, the key of G with some foreign chord at
one or the other odd place, it would be more helpful IMO to say that it
modulates into the key of D, clearly to mark the start and the end of such
"excursions" and thus to *motivate* the special chords.
For
example, I remember the difficulties I encountered many years ago when I tried
to learn melody playing J.S.Bach's Minuet on my autoharp. Nearly everybody is
well acquainted with its A part, which is quite straightforward anyway. Its B
part, however, is a bit tricky and I didn't really know it from hearing.
Well, I
had the melody line as printed music (in the key of Bb) from a collection for
alto recorder. I transposed it to the key of C, lifting it all one tone higher,
becoming aware of accidentals in the process. But it took me quite some time to
figure out what's actually goin' on in the B part, until I discovered that it
is best to start the excursion into the key of G with the first beat of measure
2 of part B and to return home to the key of C with the second beat of measure
10. In other words: While on this excursion, I use the chords G, D7 and C as
tonic, dominant and subdominant chord, respectively, and otherwise C, G7 and F,
respectively. After having analyzed the tune this way, what at first seemed
complicated, became then really easy. (To make it sound more interesting, today
I'm tinkering with using the Am (A minor) and E7 chords in measure 3 of the B
part.)
And now
the application to IN THE GARDEN ("home" key of C, modulating to the
keys of G, Am and F, at least) with giving *all* the chords for melody playing:
[C]I come
to [G7]the [C]garden [G7]a- [C]lone,
[G7]While
[C]the [F]dew is [G7]still [F]on the [C]roses,
[G7]And
[C]the [G7]voice I hear, [F]fall- [G7]ing [C]on [G7]my [C]ear,
the
[D7]Son [C]of [D7]God dis- [G7]clo- [C]os- [G7]es
[C]And
[G7]He [C]walks with me, [G7]and [F]He [G7]talks with me,
And He
tells me I [C]am [Cm]His [C]own;
And
[G7]the [C]joy we [E7]share as we [Am]tar- [C7]ry [F]there,
None
[C]other has [G7]ever [C]known.
From all
the interesting places in this tune, the first one is near the start of line 4,
where with the syllable 'Son' the tune modulates into the key of G. This first
excursion ends, when with the first (partial) syllable of 'closes' the tune
returns back home.
The
second interesting place is, of course, the last two syllables in line 6, where
I give the chords which, in fact, I use, but ... I confess, I'm cheating here:
this part probably should look as follows:
And He
tells me I [C]am [B7]His [Em]own;
[C]And
[G7]the [C]joy ...
or
And He
tells me I [Em]am [B7]His [Em]own;
[C]And
[G7]the [C]joy ...
However,
my left hand fingers are not quick enough to jump from the C (or G7) button all
the way down to the B7 button and back again from Em (I'm having the standard
(factory) OS 21 chord layout); for so short an excursion into the key of E
minor I do not want to run the risk of unintended open chording on a chromatic
autoharp! And, on the other hand, the C minor chord provides the required d#
note quite comfortably in easy reach! (This is evidence that I'm not having a
purist attitude towards my theory! :))
Finally,
in line 7, we observe a modulation through the key of A minor, starting with
syllable 'share', into the key of F, starting with the second syllable of
'tarry' (yes, there are some quite risky jumps here, too, but it mostly turns
out well :)); the excursion ends in line 8 with the first syllable of 'other'.
Conclusion
I tried
to underpin the theory that most, if not all, accidentals in tunes in the
western (occidental) music tradition can be analyzed as manifestations of
modulation into another key (not necessarily a neighbouring one in the circle
of fifth) and that, moreover, also tunes without accidentals are often properly
analyzed as containing such modulations. These modulations usually occur as rather
short "excursions", i.e. the tune usually soon returns to its
"home" key.
I contend
that viewing tunes according to this theory results in an easy and logical way
of determining the chords for melody playing them on the autoharp. While there
may be, in certain situations, more fancy or interesting chords usable, the
theory yields at least viable chords. Furthermore I contend that such a view
motivates "foreign" chords that are traditionally employed in certain
tunes; in other words: the theory gives an explanation of such chords' usage.
As a
corollary, one has to assume that, in principle, melody comes first and chords
are secondary.
This is
not contradicted by the fact that *today* composers may start with a chord
progression and then find a fitting melody line, because, based on (maybe
unconscious) knowledge of a wealth of existing melodies *and* their
accompanying chords, a composer today can "feel" what are viable
chord progressions that yield an acceptable melody, acceptable for a singer,
acceptable for a listener accustomed to the music tradition.
Well, I
hope that there are theoretically inclined cyberpluckers left that have read up
to this point! I'm looking forward to hearing your opinions.
Oh, and
what is, now, the answer to John's question: How does the Nashville numbering
system handle "excursionary" modulations?
Cheers!
Siegfried
in Cologne, Germany
Comment
(23 Jan 2007): Today I prefer to play "In the garden" in the key
of G and in fact according to the last one of the alternative chordings
mentioned above. This is facilitated partly due to a certain re-arranging of my
minor chord bars. I followed Ð partly! Ð an advice given by Bud Taylor, namely
to shift the minors row two steps to the left in order to align the relative
minor with its plain major chord button: Well, I shifted the minors just one
(1) step to the left.
Carey Dubbert looks with consternation at this guy trying to play one of Carey's own compositions
and even Mike Fenton interrupts his meal at this incredible impudence!
Photo by Nadine White taken on 19 May 2001 in the living room of her former home in Drayton near Abingdon, England
By the way, the chromatic Oscar Schmidt model OS-110-21 I'm playing here was converted into an FC diatonic by Mike Fenton in the spring of 2002; but I'm playing it very
seldom these days: my chromatic 'harps are always so demanding!